MULTIFACETED MEDIA GROUP
A place for off-topic thoughts: Comic books, movies, television and whatever
Friday, May 31, 2019
Godzilla 2014: A Godzilla Fan's ReviewAnyone who follows me on Twitter -- i.e., 95 percent of everyone reading this -- knows I am a fan of Godzilla, all 28 Japanese movies and the Zone Fighter TV show too. So naturally, I have a few things to say about the latest American attempt to bring the King of the Monsters to life.
First things first, I basically liked it. It moved along briskly, the story was pretty good, and the effects were occasionally amazing. Nevertheless, this is a movie with problems. Some stem from my purist's attachment to Godzilla, some are Storytelling 101 issues, and some fall in between.
The first and most basic problem is the slow tease. The movie takes a while to show you monsters, it takes even longer to show you Godzilla, and it takes still longer to show you a full-on monster mayhem battle. My complaint here is similar to one I voiced regarding the first season of Hannibal (and by the way, I will soon write about the amazing season two): We all know who Hannibal Lecter is, and we damn sure all know what Godzilla is. This isn't The Usual Suspects. There is absolutely no reason to try to build suspense.
We came for the monsters and the smashing of cities. Yet Godzilla 2014 is incredibly parsimonious about delivering what is arguably its only attraction. Over and over again, it teases viewers with monster battles that take place primarily off-screen. We get to see Las Vegas destroyed, but we don't get to see Las Vegas being destroyed. We see a monster arrive, and then we see the smoldering ruins. When you go to a Chuck Norris movie, you aren't paying to see Chuck walk into a room and then smash cut to a bunch of thugs lying on the floor. You want to see everything between point A and point B.
This dynamic gets old fast, and the movie twists the knife more than once by showing characters watching the actual monster battles on TV. That's right, I just paid $16 for IMAX 3D so I could watch someone watching monsters destroy Las Vegas in a grainy picture on a flat screen.
There are compensations for this. We do get to see the monsters in full 3D glory, and repeatedly. And the final battle, much of which takes place on screen, has a lot to recommend it.
Wednesday, September 16, 2015
#YourName2016A pre-debate look at the GOP candidates on social media
By J.M. Berger
Top 10 other hashtags used by users who tweeted a candidate's official tag (case-sensitive)
It’s easy sport to count hashtags as a measure of success, and by that basic measure, it’s pretty clear that Donald Trump is crushing his competition on Twitter. In part, this is due to his longstanding and unfiltered presence on the platform. @RealDonaldTrump is the kind of Twitter account that generates buzz, if not always affection.
But there are other ways to use hashtags to gain insights. One approach that I’ve found useful is to examine the other hashtags people used by people who use a hashtag of interest. In other words, what do users who tweet #Trump2016 talk about when they are not talking about Trump?
In advance of tonight’s CNN debate, I ran this analysis on the primary hashtags used by each of the top five candidates, as ranked by CNN’s poll of polls used to determine who would participate and how they would be placed on the stage. I plan to do the same analysis for the Democratic candidates as we get closer to their first debate.
The hashtags I used were based on the better-performing of the candidate’s official tag or their name combined with 2016, or both if they performed very similarly. The hashtags analyzed were #Trump2016, #Jeb2016, #AllInForJeb, #Walker16, #Carson2016, #CruzCrews and #Cruz2016.
I collected the last 200 tweets for each user who tweeted the tag, within Twitter’s search API limits (this is roughly all tweets from the past week, or about the most recent 3,000 tweets if the tag appears more than 3,000 per week). The hashtags were analyzed on a case-sensitive basis.
It comes as no surprise that Donald Trump is outpacing the competition by leaps and bounds. His success is partly organic, but it is also significantly driven by online activism, including a highly organized group of users who employ #tcot (Top Conservatives on Twitter) and #PJNET, the hashtag associated with the Patriot Journalist Network, a website and Twitter app used to organize social media campaigns with an extremely conservative bent.
Third-ranked was #MakeAmericaGreatAgain, the campaign slogan. While this tag, measured separately, performed almost as strongly as #Trump2016, its performance closely tracked the latter tag, suggesting it has basically the same user base.
The fourth-most used hashtag, #WakeUpAmerica, is associated with anti-immigration rhetoric, much of it specifically anti-Muslim in nature, which may have been emphasized by the anniversary of September 11 falling within the sample period.
Below the top five, hashtags ranged over a number of fairly divisive issues, such as gay marriage, exactly whose "lives matter" and the Iran deal. Users also heavily tweeted the hashtags of other candidates, often in attack mode.
Perhaps the most interesting finding in the data is how poorly Jeb Bush is performing, which seems to be a a direct result of a lackluster social media strategy, despite his second-place standing in the polls.
Bush supporters are using three competing hashtags to promote his campaign -- #Jeb2016 (the most-used by a thin margin), #Bush2016 and the tag being promoted prominently on his website, #AllInforJeb. The latter is a terrible hashtag, in part because it capitalizes each word, which means on Twitter’s sans serif typeface, the lowercase Ls in “All” visually merge with the capital I, producing the confusing appearance of #ALLLNFORJEB.
No matter how you slice it, even if you combine all three tags, this is an embarrassingly small showing for a frontrunner, many times smaller than tweets in support of Trump.
Because tweets about Jeb were widely dispersed among the three different tags, Trump supporters were able to tap dance all over Bush supporters on #Jeb2016. Users who employed the #Jeb2016 hashtag tweeted #Trump2016 almost ten times as often. The top five hashtags used by those who tweeted #Jeb2016 were identical to the top five from the #Trump2016 users, although in slightly different proportions.
The simplest explanation for this is borne out by an examination of the tweets collected: #Jeb2016 has been weaponized against Bush by Trump supporters, and very effectively too. The #WakeUpAmerica hashtag ranked even higher in the #Jeb2016 dataset, suggesting the immigration issue is driving a significant chunk of anti-Bush activity.
In light of this, I looked at the users who tweeted #AllInForJeb, expecting to find more genuine support. Here, Bush’s tag ranked first and performed better than #Trump2016, but only by about four to one, and on much lower volume.
Other than this mixed tidbit, the news was not especially good. #tcot and #GOPDebate were second and third. The fourth most-tweeted tag was #sayfie, a Florida political website whose coverage is not especially friendly to Bush, and fifth was #WakeUpAmerica, the anti-immigration tag, representing another hostile constituency. #PJNET, trending mostly toward Trump, ranked eighth and a Ted Cruz hashtag, #CruzCrew, ranked 10th.
Below the top lines on the chart, hashtags used by the #AllInForJeb crowd very much suggest the output of a political machine rather than words from the hearts of ordinary humans, with top-ranked tags including #GOP, #nhpolitics, #FITN (another New Hampshire primary tag), #ncpol and #iacaucus -- none of which ranked particularly high among his competitors. The political class is turning out for Bush on social media, but fewer ordinary voters.
Would a stronger social media game would help Bush compete more effectively with Trump? Probably, but it's not a slam dunk. Based on the organized activist component observed in #Trump2016 tweets, The Donald's supporters are probably not tapped out on capacity, and they could respond strongly to a strong counteroffensive.
Scott Walker, ranked third in the CNN poll of polls, promoted his campaign with the official hashtag #Walker16, rather than #Walker2016. The good news for Walker is that his tag crushed all three of Bush’s hashtags for overall volume, but he in turn was similarly dominated by Trump. On the bright side, users who tweeted #Walker16 did so more than 10 times as often as they tweeted #Trump2016, in sharp contrast to Bush’s performance.
Beneath this relatively optimistic result, however, trouble lurks. An extraordinarily large number of tweets by people who used the #Walker15 hashtag also used tags that were hostile to the candidate. The number two tag, #wiunion, was devoted mainly to attacks from the left on Walker’s anti-labor record as governor of Wisconsin, although a significant number of supporters were using the tag for counterattacks.
The fourth most-tweeted hashtag was #UniteBlue, a liberal activism hashtag and social media app that roughly mirrors #PJNET, and the fifth was #p2, a hashtag used by progressives that roughly mirrors #tcot. It's very unusual to see these tags outperform their conservative counterparts, especially within a discussion of a conservative candidates.
In short, a whole lot of people using the #Walker16 hashtag are organized adversaries of the candidate, but at least they aren’t his competitors.
The top hashtags were fairly light on issue-based keywords aside from a few current GOP staples reflected by all the candidates -- #IranDeal, #KimDavis, and variations on the Which Lives Matter theme.
Ben Carson had a tougher, weirder run of it. Like Bush, tweets were divided pretty widely between two hashtags, the official #BC2DC and the unofficial #Carson2016.
Among users who tweeted either hashtag, #tcot and #PJNET ranked first and second, with #WakeUpAmerica coming in third, all easily beating the candidate’s hashtag within the sample.
Among users who tweeted #Carson2016, almost twice as many tweeted #Trump2016, again pointing to the weaponization of an obvious hashtag. This may have been driven partly by a dustup between the two candidates last week. On the official hashtag, #BC2DC16 beat #Trump2016 by about five to one.
Top issues for Carson tweeters included Iran, Planned Parenthood and gun control, which appeared at somewhat higher ranks than they did in his competitors’ charts.
Just in case you had any doubt that it’s difficult to be a prominent African-American in the Republican Party, racially charged hashtags ranked noticeably higher among users who tweeted #Carson2016 than among any of the other candidates.
These included #WhiteGenocide (16th) -- favored by racist extremists -- and #cuckservative (23rd), which is a whole story unto itself. A notable number of users employing the #Carson2016 hashtag were neo-Nazis and various other flavors of white supremacist.
The fifth-ranked Republican in the poll of polls was Ted Cruz, and his results may provide some measure of consolation to Bush, as his poll numbers remain fairly low despite a relatively strong social media game.
The campaign’s clever hashtag, #cruzcrew, outperformed #Cruz2016 handily, and both showed signs that they were mainly being used by supporters. The success of the former was driven, at least in part, by the branding “Cruz Crew App,” a social campaign application with gamification elements, although as a percentage of all actual tweets, the app’s impact was difficult to gauge.
Users who employed either #CruzCrew or #Cruz2016 did not primarily tweet Cruz-related hashtags, with first, second and third place taken by #tcot, #PJNET and #WakeUpAmerica respectively in both sets.
#CruzCrew users were slightly less focused than those tweeting #Cruz2016. Bitcoin made an unexpected appearance near the top of the issues list, which may be driven by the presence of non-Cruz spammers and apps in the set (people likely to install a Ted Cruz app are probably pretty digitally promiscuous). The usual suspects were present -- Iran, Planned Parenthood, gun control -- with a slightly heavier emphasis on anti-abortion issues than some of the other candidates.
There are a couple of useful findings in this preliminary look at how the primaries are playing out on social media.
First, if you’re running for president, you should make an effort to own #YourName2016, because if you don’t, other people will step up and appropriate it, and you can’t rely on them to be friendly, especially if you’re tangling with Donald Trump.
Second, mention your enemies, and encourage your supporters to do so. Trump’s social media game includes pervasive mentions of whichever candidate he is feuding with at the moment. When you search for information on a non-Trump candidate on Twitter, you’re likely to see a lot of negative comments. While few candidates would care to go toe-to-toe with Trump in the arena of negative campaigning, it might be better to put up a fight than to simply forfeit the battlefield.
Third, use your own hashtags. Jeb Bush tweeted #edreform, an issue based tag, almost seven times as often as he used #AllInForJeb, which he has only ever tweeted 12 times. He has never tweeted #Jeb2016. In contrast, Donald Trump has tweeted #Trump2016 154 times and #MakeAmericaGreatAgain 122 times since late April.
Fourth, use existing activist hashtags. While there may be nuanced arguments in favor of avoiding #tcot, Republican primaries are clearly about the base, and #tcot is widely used by the base. If an existing tag is not working for you, it might be working against you.
Fifth, volume, volume, volume. Ted Cruz is outperforming his poll numbers on social media in part thanks to higher levels of activity. Users tweeting #Cruz2016 averaged 99 tweets per day and #CruzCrews scored 84, compared to 70 for #Trump2016 and 38 for #AllInForJeb. Trump’s numbers here are not necessarily a sign of weakness; the overall performance of the hashtag suggests the tweets-per-day stat is dampened by the large amount of casual interest in his campaign, which is a plus, not a minus.
Sixth, clever counts, but only up to a point. #CruzCrew works, in part because it’s a good hashtag, but mostly because it’s being driven by the app. In contrast, #AllInForJeb is an awkward mouthful made moreso by the lowercase L, uppercase I problem. Which brings us back to the first point. #YourName2016 is what voters expect and what they will look for. If you’re going to be clever, follow the Cruz example and make an effort to promote your hipster hashtag concurrently with boring old standard model.
Sunday, April 12, 2015
Daredevil vs. Arrow: A Qualitative AnalysisHere's a handy chart evaluating the differences between Daredevil and Arrow. Because I know you needed one.
THE BOOKJihad Joe is the first comprehensive history of the American jihadist movement, tracking the phenomenon from the 1970s to the present. The book has been praised in reviews by the New York Times, Publisher's Weekly, the Washington Times, Redstate.com, Library Journal and more. It is available in hardcover eveywhere books are sold, as well as Kindle, Nook and Google ebook editions.
ISIS: THE STATE
Stern and J.M. Berger co-author the new book, "ISIS:
The State of Terror," from Ecco, an imprint of
HarperCollins. The book, on sale now, examines the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, its
potential fall, how it is transforming the nature of extremist
movements, and how we should evaluate the threat it presents.
Jessica Stern is a
Harvard lecturer on terrorism and the author of the seminal text
Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill. J.M.
Berger is author of the definitive book on American jihadists,
Jihad Joe: Americans Who Go to War in the Name of Islam, a
frequent contributor to Foreign Policy and a non-resident fellow
with the Brookings Institution, Project on U.S.
Relations with the Islamic World.